Quick Answer
Buy-sell agreement valuation determines the buyout price when a partner or shareholder triggers an exit event: death, disability, divorce, deadlock, retirement, termination, voluntary withdrawal, or shareholder oppression. The forensic CPA applies the standard of value defined in the agreement (fair market value, fair value, investment value, formula price), then applies the income approach (capitalized earnings, DCF), market approach (guideline public companies, transaction multiples), and asset approach when appropriate. Florida shareholder-oppression actions apply the fair-value standard under Fla. Stat. 607.1430. Discounts for lack of marketability (DLOM) and lack of control (DLOC) are applied per the agreement’s terms. Joey Friedman CPA PA, ABV-credentialed and serving Hollywood FL, Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Tampa, Orlando, and West Palm Beach, prepares Daubert-defensible buy-sell valuations $5,000-$50,000+.
Joey Friedman CPA PA is a litigation-focused forensic accounting and business valuation firm. We do not prepare income tax returns or provide tax planning services. Our practice serves attorneys, businesses, and individuals in financial disputes, divorce, expert witness engagements, and forensic investigations.
What to Gather Before a Buy-Sell Agreement Valuation Begins
A buy-sell agreement works better when the standard of value, triggering events, funding terms, and current financial records are defined before a dispute arises. Attorneys, business owners, and advisors who organize these issues before a trigger event or dispute can reduce delay, cost, and exposure to competing-valuation challenges. The following intake checklist covers the four core areas that drive virtually every buy-sell valuation dispute.
The Governing Agreement
Obtain the most current version of the buy-sell, shareholder, operating, or partnership agreement, including all amendments. Confirm whether the agreement specifies a valuation standard (fair market value, fair value, or a defined formula), names a methodology, restricts applicable discounts, or sets a time frame. Conflicting or ambiguous provisions should be identified and resolved before the appraiser is retained.
The Triggering Event
Document the nature and date of the triggering event precisely. Different events — death, disability, voluntary departure, termination, divorce, or dispute — can activate different provisions in the same agreement. If the triggering event itself is contested, the valuation expert should be retained with that dispute in mind so the report addresses all plausible scenarios.
The Valuation Date
The valuation date controls which financial data, economic conditions, and market comparables govern the analysis. In a litigated or contested matter, opposing experts, owners, counsel, and advisors may scrutinize the selected date closely, so the governing language and any ambiguities should be identified before valuation work begins.
Records and Normalization Issues
Provide at least three to five years of tax returns, compiled or reviewed financial statements, and management accounts. Identify related-party transactions, owner compensation that diverges from market norms, non-recurring expenses, and any pending litigation or contingent liabilities. These items directly affect normalized earnings and, therefore, the concluded value. Gaps or irregularities discovered late in the engagement create openings for challenge by opposing experts, owners, counsel, advisors, and decision-makers reviewing the report.
Opposing Expert and Dispute Risk
When a buy-sell valuation is likely to be challenged, choosing an expert with valuation and dispute-support experience helps the report address methodology, records, assumptions, and standard-of-value issues before deadlines narrow the available options. See also the firm’s expert witness and litigation support overview for a full description of available services.
A defensible report anticipates the questions that opposing experts, owners, counsel, advisors, and decision-makers are likely to ask about methodology, adjustments, comparables, and the selected valuation date. That requires methodology transparency, clear documentation of every adjustment, and a thorough comparables analysis. Reports produced without this scrutiny in mind frequently require costly supplementation or expose the matter to an unfavorable result at any stage of the dispute.