After the Agreement and Records Are Collected
Once a triggering event has produced competing valuations or a matter is moving toward mediation or litigation, the priority shifts from preparation to damage control. The issues that drive disputes at this stage are predictable: conflicting standards of value, a valuation date that was never defined in the agreement, normalization adjustments the opposing expert will contest, and a report that was not drafted with cross-examination in mind.
Retaining an expert at the dispute stage requires a different intake conversation than a pre-dispute engagement. Counsel should be prepared to identify the specific provisions the opposing expert is likely to attack, any prior appraisals that may be used against the client, and the procedural posture of the matter — whether it is in pre-litigation negotiation, arbitration, or active litigation. The earlier a credentialed expert is retained in this process, the more options remain available to counsel.
Joey Friedman CPA provides valuation services at every stage of a buy-sell dispute, from initial review of an opposing expert’s report to deposition and trial testimony. Engagements at the dispute stage are handled with the same methodology transparency and documentation standards used in pre-dispute work, so the report is defensible regardless of when in the process it is prepared.
A stronger buy-sell valuation engagement begins when the governing agreement, triggering event, valuation date, and normalization issues are aligned before report drafting begins.